You are here: Nature's Prime Organic Foods, Inc. »

January, 2011

5 Foods You Never Thought to Candy

Written by Kimberley Stakal

candiedbacon-ccflcr-chefdruckCandied corn? Check. Candied ginger? Check. Candied citrus peel? Check. Yawn, snooze. Candy fanatics, check it out. There are some far more interesting foods you can candy in your kitchen, and they might surprise you. From the crazy-trendy candied bacon to the old-school (kind of unbelievable) candied potatoes, once you learn to master these candying skills, you’ll be one step closer to celebrity chef status.

Bacon

If you’ve fallen victim to the $5 bacon cupcake – you just had to try it – save yourself the dough next time and DIY! The key is in the candy, my friend. Just bake it and forget it (until you eat it, that is). Put candied bacon on your cupcakes and sweets, in an Elvis-inspired peanut butter sandwich, or straight on a plate for the perfect midnight nosh.

1 teaspoon olive oil
¾ cup packed light brown sugar
1 teaspoon ground spice of choice (try cumin, chili powder or cinnamon)
1 pound sliced bacon

1.    Preheat oven to 350°F. Line a baking pan with foil, and place a broiler rack on top of the pan. Coat the rack with oil.
2.    Mix sugar and spices in a large bowl. Add bacon and press mixture onto each bacon slice. Place bacon slice on oiled rack in a single layer, sprinkling with any remaining sugar mixture.
3.    Bake until bacon is nice and crispy, about 20 minutes. Transfer to towels to drain, then transfer to a dish to cool completely.

Jalapenos

There’s something downright devilish about foods that are as sweet as they are hot. Use candied jalapenos to make a killer sub sandwich, for your next Fish Taco Friday, or for a kicked up Mexican salad.

1 ½ cups water
1 cup sugar
4 jalapenos, cut into rounds, seeds discarded

1.    Combine water and sugar in a small pot. Heat over medium until a syrup forms, whisking occasionally. Add jalapenos and heat about 4 minutes. Remove and transfer to rack or plate to cool and dry.
2.    Repeat until all peppers are used; discard remaining syrup.

Potatoes

Candied potatoes? Kind of. Mashed potatoes create a no-bake cookie meets old-time candy in these rolled up potato candies. Let us know when you’ve made them—and send us a sample.

1 cup mashed potatoes
1 bag powdered sugar
1 cup peanut butter

1.    Beat sugar into potatoes in a large bowl until well mixed. Roll out with a rolling pin on a piece of wax paper until about pizza dough thickness and size.
2.    Cover surface with peanut butter. Roll up dough to make a peanut butter-filled log. Wrap in plastic and refrigerate 2 hours, until firm. Slice and serve!

Sage

For the fancy pants-chef in you: Candied sage is the ultimate gourmet garnish for jazzing up fish, pastas and even savory desserts. Look at you go.

1 bunch (10 to 20 leaves) fresh sage leaves
1 egg white, lightly beaten
Superfine sugar, as needed (about ¼ cup)

1.    Wash leaves and blot dry, being careful to keep them intact.
2.    Drop each leaf to coat in egg white, then coat thoroughly in sugar. Shake off excess. Place on a rack to dry completely.

Candied flowers

Now you’re really fancy. Top off a wedding cake, make a super citrus salad, or just show someone you love them with these crystallized beauties.

Small bunch edible flowers (about 10 to 20)
1 egg white, lightly beaten
Superfine sugar, as needed (about ½ cup)

1.    Use a paintbrush to gently paint egg wash onto flowers. Coat both sides. Holding flowers over a bowl, gently sprinkle sugar over entire flower to coat, letting excess shake off.
2.    Place on a rack to dry completely, away from moisture and light (may take about 12 hours to completely dry).

Image: chefdruck

The Organic Elite Surrenders to Monsanto: What now?

“The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must.”   -  Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011

In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation’s 25,000 organic farms and ranches, America’s organic consumers and producers are facing betrayal. A self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it’s time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto’s controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for “coexistence” with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.

In a cleverly worded, but profoundly misleading email sent to its customers last week, Whole Foods Market, while proclaiming their support for organics and “seed purity,” gave the green light to USDA bureaucrats to approve the “conditional deregulation” of Monsanto’s genetically engineered, herbicide-resistant alfalfa.  Beyond the regulatory euphemism of “conditional deregulation,” this means that WFM and their colleagues are willing to go along with the massive planting of a chemical and energy-intensive GE perennial crop, alfalfa; guaranteed to spread its mutant genes and seeds across the nation; guaranteed to contaminate the alfalfa fed to organic animals; guaranteed to lead to massive poisoning of farm workers and destruction of the essential soil food web by the toxic herbicide, Roundup; and guaranteed to produce Roundup-resistant superweeds that will require even more deadly herbicides such as 2,4 D to be sprayed on millions of acres of alfalfa across the U.S.

In exchange for allowing Monsanto’s premeditated pollution of the alfalfa gene pool, WFM wants “compensation.” In exchange for a new assault on farmworkers and rural communities (a recent large-scale Swedish study found that spraying Roundup doubles farm workers’ and rural residents’ risk of getting cancer), WFM expects the pro-biotech USDA to begin to regulate rather than cheerlead for Monsanto. In payment for a new broad spectrum attack on the soil’s crucial ability to provide nutrition for food crops and to sequester dangerous greenhouse gases (recent studies show that Roundup devastates essential soil microorganisms that provide plant nutrition and sequester climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases), WFM wants the Biotech Bully of St. Louis to agree to pay “compensation” (i.e. hush money) to farmers “for any losses related to the contamination of his crop.”

In its email of Jan. 21, 2011 WFM calls for “public oversight by the USDA rather than reliance on the biotechnology industry,” even though WFM knows full well that federal regulations on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) do not require pre-market safety testing, nor labeling; and that even federal judges have repeatedly ruled that so-called government “oversight” of Frankencrops such as Monsanto’s sugar beets and alfalfa is basically a farce. At the end of its email, WFM admits that its surrender to Monsanto is permanent: “The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well  True coexistence is a must.”

Why Is Organic Inc. Surrendering?

According to informed sources, the CEOs of WFM and Stonyfield are personal friends of former Iowa governor, now USDA Secretary, Tom Vilsack, and in fact made financial contributions to Vilsack’s previous electoral campaigns. Vilsack was hailed as “Governor of the Year” in 2001 by the Biotechnology Industry Organization, and traveled in a Monsanto corporate jet on the campaign trail. Perhaps even more fundamental to Organic Inc.’s abject surrender is the fact that the organic elite has become more and more isolated from the concerns and passions of organic consumers and locavores. The Organic Inc. CEOs are tired of activist pressure, boycotts, and petitions. Several of them have told me this to my face. They apparently believe that the battle against GMOs has been lost, and that it’s time to reach for the consolation prize.  The consolation prize they seek is a so-called “coexistence” between the biotech Behemoth and the organic community that will lull the public to sleep and greenwash the unpleasant fact that Monsanto’s unlabeled and unregulated genetically engineered crops are now spreading their toxic genes on 1/3 of U.S. (and 1/10 of global) crop land.

WFM and most of the largest organic companies have deliberately separated themselves from anti-GMO efforts and cut off all funding to campaigns working to label or ban GMOs. The so-called Non-GMO Project, funded by Whole Foods and giant wholesaler United Natural Foods (UNFI) is basically a greenwashing effort (although the 100% organic companies involved in this project seem to be operating in good faith) to show that certified organic foods are basically free from GMOs (we already know this since GMOs are banned in organic production), while failing to focus on so-called “natural” foods, which constitute most of WFM and UNFI’s sales and are routinely contaminated with GMOs.

From their “business as usual” perspective, successful lawsuits against GMOs filed by public interest groups such as the Center for Food Safety; or noisy attacks on Monsanto by groups like the Organic Consumers Association, create bad publicity, rattle their big customers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Kroger, Costco, Supervalu, Publix and Safeway; and remind consumers that organic crops and foods such as corn, soybeans, and canola are slowly but surely becoming contaminated by Monsanto’s GMOs.

Whole Food’s Dirty Little Secret: Most of the So-Called “Natural” Processed Foods and Animal Products They Sell Are Contaminated with GMOs

The main reason, however, why Whole Foods is pleading for coexistence with Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, BASF and the rest of the biotech bullies, is that they desperately want the controversy surrounding genetically engineered foods and crops to go away. Why? Because they know, just as we do, that 2/3 of WFM’s $9 billion annual sales is derived from so-called “natural” processed foods and animal products that are contaminated with GMOs. We and our allies have tested their so-called “natural” products (no doubt WFM’s lab has too) containing non-organic corn and soy, and guess what: they’re all contaminated with GMOs, in contrast to their certified organic products, which are basically free of GMOs, or else contain barely detectable trace amounts.

Approximately 2/3 of the products sold by Whole Foods Market and their main distributor, United Natural Foods (UNFI) are not certified organic, but rather are conventional (chemical-intensive and GMO-tainted) foods and products disguised as “natural.”

Unprecedented wholesale and retail control of the organic marketplace by UNFI and Whole Foods, employing a business model of selling twice as much so-called “natural” food as certified organic food, coupled with the takeover of many organic companies by multinational food corporations such as Dean Foods, threatens the growth of the organic movement.

Covering Up GMO Contamination: Perpetrating “Natural” Fraud

Many well-meaning consumers are confused about the difference between conventional products marketed as “natural,” and those nutritionally/environmentally superior and climate-friendly products that are “certified organic.”

Retail stores like WFM and wholesale distributors like UNFI have failed to educate their customers about the qualitative difference between natural and certified organic, conveniently glossing over the fact that nearly all of the processed “natural” foods and products they sell contain GMOs, or else come from a “natural” supply chain where animals are force-fed GMO grains in factory farms or Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs).

A troubling trend in organics today is the calculated shift on the part of certain large formerly organic brands from certified organic ingredients and products to so-called “natural” ingredients. With the exception of the “grass-fed and grass-finished” meat sector, most “natural” meat, dairy, and eggs are coming from animals reared on GMO grains and drugs, and confined, entirely, or for a good portion of their lives, in CAFOs.

Whole Foods and UNFI are maximizing their profits by selling quasi-natural products at premium organic prices. Organic consumers are increasingly left without certified organic choices while genuine organic farmers and ranchers continue to lose market share to “natural” imposters. It’s no wonder that less than 1% of American farmland is certified organic, while well-intentioned but misled consumers have boosted organic and “natural” purchases to $80 billion annually-approximately 12% of all grocery store sales.

The Solution: Truth-in-Labeling Will Enable Consumers to Drive So-Called “Natural” GMO and CAFO-Tainted Foods Off the Market

There can be no such thing as “coexistence” with a reckless industry that undermines public health, destroys biodiversity, damages the environment, tortures and poisons animals, destabilizes the climate, and economically devastates the world’s 1.5 billion seed-saving small farmers.  There is no such thing as coexistence between GMOs and organics in the European Union. Why? Because in the EU there are almost no GMO crops under cultivation, nor GM consumer food products on supermarket shelves. And why is this? Because under EU law, all foods containing GMOs or GMO ingredients must be labeled. Consumers have the freedom to choose or not to choose GMOs; while farmers, food processors, and retailers have (at least legally) the right to lace foods with GMOs, as long as they are safety-tested and labeled. Of course the EU food industry understands that consumers, for the most part, do not want to purchase or consume GE foods. European farmers and food companies, even junk food purveyors like McDonald’s and Wal-Mart, understand quite well the concept expressed by a Monsanto executive when GMOs first came on the market: “If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.”

The biotech industry and Organic Inc. are supremely conscious of the fact that North American consumers, like their European counterparts, are wary and suspicious of GMO foods. Even without a PhD, consumers understand you don’t want your food safety or environmental sustainability decisions to be made by out-of-control chemical companies like Monsanto, Dow, or Dupont – the same people who brought you toxic pesticides, Agent Orange, PCBs, and now global warming. Industry leaders are acutely aware of the fact that every single industry or government poll over the last 16 years has shown that 85-95% of American consumers want mandatory labels on GMO foods. Why? So that we can avoid buying them. GMO foods have absolutely no benefits for consumers or the environment, only hazards. This is why Monsanto and their friends in the Bush, Clinton, and Obama administrations have prevented consumer GMO truth-in-labeling laws from getting a public discussion in Congress.

Although Congressman Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) recently introduced a bill in Congress calling for mandatory labeling and safety testing for GMOs, don’t hold your breath for Congress to take a stand for truth-in-labeling and consumers’ right to know what’s in their food. Especially since the 2010 Supreme Court decision in the so-called “Citizens United” case gave big corporations and billionaires the right to spend unlimited amounts of money (and remain anonymous, as they do so) to buy media coverage and elections, our chances of passing federal GMO labeling laws against the wishes of Monsanto and Food Inc. are all but non-existent. Perfectly dramatizing the “Revolving Door” between Monsanto and the Federal Government, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, formerly chief counsel for Monsanto, delivered one of the decisive votes in the Citizens United case, in effect giving Monsanto and other biotech bullies the right to buy the votes it needs in the U.S. Congress.

With big money controlling Congress and the media, we have little choice but to shift our focus and go local. We’ve got to concentrate our forces where our leverage and power lie, in the marketplace, at the retail level; pressuring retail food stores to voluntarily label their products; while on the legislative front we must organize a broad coalition to pass mandatory GMO (and CAFO) labeling laws, at the city, county, and state levels.

The Organic Consumers Association, joined by our consumer, farmer, environmental, and labor allies, has just launched a nationwide Truth-in-Labeling campaign to stop Monsanto and the Biotech Bullies from force-feeding unlabeled GMOs to animals and humans.

Utilizing scientific data, legal precedent, and consumer power the OCA and our local coalitions will educate and mobilize at the grassroots level to pressure giant supermarket chains (Wal-Mart, Kroger, Costco, Safeway, Supervalu, and Publix) and natural food retailers such as Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s to voluntarily implement “truth-in-labeling” practices for GMOs and CAFO products; while simultaneously organizing a critical mass to pass mandatory local and state truth-in-labeling ordinances – similar to labeling laws already in effect for country of origin, irradiated food, allergens, and carcinogens. If local and state government bodies refuse to take action, wherever possible we must attempt to gather sufficient petition signatures and place these truth-in-labeling initiatives directly on the ballot in 2011 or 2012. If you’re interesting in helping organize or coordinate a Millions Against Monsanto and Factory Farms Truth-in-Labeling campaign in your local community, sign up here: http://organicconsumers.org/oca-volunteer/

To pressure Whole Foods Market and the nation’s largest supermarket chains to voluntarily adopt truth-in-labeling practices sign here, and circulate this petition widely: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22309.cfm

And please stay tuned to Organic Bytes for the latest developments in our campaigns.

Power to the People! Not the Corporations!

Ronnie Cummins
Organic Consumers Association

Minnesota Lawmakers Propose Easier Rules for Raw Milk

Updated: Friday, 28 Jan 2011, 7:46 PM CST
Published : Friday, 28 Jan 2011, 7:46 PM CST

ST. PAUL – Some legislators say it should be easier for Minnesota consumers to buy raw milk, a position that puts them at odds with health regulators and most of the state’s dairy industry.
Companion bills introduced in the Minnesota House and Senate on this week would legalize direct farm-to-consumer sales of unpasteurized milk at farmers markets, as well as deliveries to private homes and private buying clubs.

Current state law allows sales of unpasteurized milk only at the farms that produce it.

No action is scheduled so far.

The Minnesota Milk Producers Association, which represents farmers who pasteurize their milk, is already lining up against the bills.

Its executive director, Bob Lefebvre, tells Minnesota Public Radio says easing the rules would be dangerous. Health officials say unpasteurized milk is a serious health risk.

Taco Bell Sued Over Meat That’s Just 35 Percent Beef Read

Published January 25, 2011

| FoxNews.com

TacoBell.com

You’ll have to pardon the puns, but…

Taco Bell might want to change it’s “Think Outside the Bun” campaign to “What’s Really in That Taco?” after a class-action lawsuit filed against the fast-food giant claimed its taco filler doesn’t, um, “meat” federal standards.

The suit against the YUM-brands chain also has a “beef” with the company’s advertising, charging its claims of using “seasoned ground beef” or “seasoned beef” in its food products is false.

According to the suit filed by the Alabama law firm Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, the YUM-brands owned chain is using a meat mixture that contains binders and extenders, and does not meet the minimum requirements set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to be labeled as “beef.”

Attorney Dee Miles said the meat mixture contained just 35 percent beef, with the remaining 65 percent containing water, wheat oats, soy lecithin, maltodrextrin, anti-dusting agent and modified corn starch.

The suit was filed on behalf of Taco Bell customer and California resident Amanda Obney, who is not seeking monetary damages, but instead wants a court to order Taco Bell to be honest in its advertising.

“We are asking that they stop saying that they are selling beef,” Miles said.

Irvine, Calif.-based Taco Bell spokesman Rob Poetsch said the company denies that its advertising is misleading and said the company would “vigorously defend the suit.”

While the company does list its ingredients on its website — and indicates whether they are allergens — registered dietitian and Fox News contributor Tanya Zuckerbrot said the fillers could be a danger for some consumers.

“Wheat oats, soy lecithin and maltodrextrin are common allergens that are often added to processed foods as fillers because they are much less expensive than meat,” she said. “Aside from being misleading, this form of false advertising puts the consumer at risk as well.”

Zuckerbrot said according to the USDA, “ground beef can have seasonings, but no water, phosphates, extenders, or binders added.” The meat from Taco Bell does not meet the minimum requirements set by the USDA, she said.

“Rather than Taco Bell calling the meat ‘seasoned ground beef’ they should refer to it as ‘mixed meat’ and list the additional ingredients so consumers can know what they are putting into their mouths,” she said.

The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/01/25/wheres-beef-taco-bell-sued-ingredients/#ixzz1CLsZ0eyH

5 Vegetables to Bake in Your Cupcake

PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kimberley Stakal www.organicauthority.com

cupcakesDid you know that the USDA recommends getting five to nine servings of fruits and vegetables a day — nine?! C’mon, it’s hard for a girl to count greens, especially if she’s also counting calories, carbs and dollars while shopping. Good thing there’s a way to sneak extra veggies into your diet — by baking with them. Check out these five vegetables that you can put in your next batch of homemade cupcakes. That’s one small step for carbs; one giant leap for veggies.

Zucchini
Shredded zucchini seems to dissolve into cupcakes in the oven — you usually can’t taste or see any difference from them. Because of this, they’re great for fooling your niece or boyfriend into eating more veggies. Get recipe here.

Beets
If you’ve ever cooked with beets, you’re well aware of their crazy ability to stain things magenta. What could possibly make for a better natural cupcake coloring than this? Very little. Make your cupcakes a bit pinker and sweeter all at once with shredded fresh beets. Get recipe here.

Carrots
Carrots aren’t just for cake, you know. They’re rich in natural sugars (and tons of skin-rejuvenating carotenoids), so adding these to your cupcakes is smart for your stomach and for your skin. Get recipe here.

Sweet potatoes
Sort of an obvious one, so it’s surprising that people usually just use canned pumpkin and sweet potatoes for pies. Use the same stuff in your cupcakes for a smooth, creamy and irresistible sweet boost. Take it a step healthier, and use fresh sweet potatoes, forgoing the can and chemicals that come along with it. Get recipe here. 

Sauerkraut
You’ve probably just made a sour face, haven’t you? Yes, we’re talking the same sauerkraut your Polish grandmother used to make in her basement. The juicy, cultured cabbage makes for one surprisingly awesome addition to cupcakes — it melts into the batter and pairs deliciously with chocolate. Enough said. Get recipe here.

Image: lamantin

Take the mystery out of dairy shelf life

life

Published: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 12:00 AM     Updated: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 8:56 AM

TEST KITCHEN:

FOODday often receives questions from readers about how long dairy products can be stored and how to tell when they’ve gone bad. The answers depend on several factors.

Storage temperature has a lot to do with the shelf life of dairy products. If your milk is spoiling before the date on the container, your refrigerator may be too warm. Milk should keep about seven days after this date. Ideal refrigerator temperature is 40 degrees or lower. When milk develops an off flavor, throw it out. Using it in baked products is not recommended, as the flavor will come through. In-the-door storage, although very handy, doesn’t keep milk cold enough.

Following are some guidelines for other dairy products. (They assume products have not become warm before they were placed in the refrigerator.)

  • Buttermilk has the best flavor if used the first week or by the “sell by” date, although it usually will keep two weeks refrigerated. Beyond that, it can become too bitter to drink. Spoilage can appear as off odors or as a grayish liquid on top. It can be frozen; use within three months for best quality.
  • Sour cream will maintain good eating quality for two to three weeks. As long as it looks and tastes all right, it is safe to eat. Sour cream should be discarded if you see mold spots, pink or green scum, or cloudy liquid on top. Freezing is not recommended because it causes separation.
  • Yogurt will maintain good quality for one to two weeks. It should be discarded if there are any signs of blue, green or pink mold. It can also develop a yeasty flavor. Yogurt can be frozen for one to two months.
  • Cream stays fresh for about one week. Ultrapasteurized cream will keep longer before opening; after that its shelf life equals that of pasteurized cream. Unwhipped cream also can be frozen, but the volume will be less when whipped.
  • Cottage cheese will keep about five days. Do not use if mold appears. Cottage cheese becomes grainy if frozen, but it’s not noticeable if mixed in a dish such as lasagna.
  • Butter that has been opened will have the best flavor if it is stored in a covered dish and refrigerated in the butter compartment. Unopened butter may be kept on the refrigerator shelf for several weeks. Spoiled butter will taste strong and rancid. To freeze, wrap in foil or place in freezer bags. Frozen butter keeps well six to nine months.
  • Brick cream cheese should be used by the date on the package for peak flavor. Don’t use if mold appears or it has very sour flavor. It can be frozen up to two months, but plan to use it for cooking instead of as a spread, because the texture changes, Whipped cream cheese can be frozen up to six months. Soft cream cheese does not freeze well.
  • Firm cheeses keep well for several weeks if protected from mold and drying. Discard a soft cheese if you see any signs of mold, which spreads easily through soft cheeses. If mold appears on hard cheese, cut it off. Discard if mold is extensive or cheese has lost its original color and texture. Discard blue or other blue-veined cheese if you see mold growth different from the normal veining. Most cheeses freeze well for up to six months. Firm cheese such as cheddar and Monterey jack become crumbly after being frozen and do not slice well. A solution is to shred cheese before freezing it.

World Leaders to Discuss Junk Food Ad Ban at UN

Published January 22, 2011 | FoxNews.com

The U.N. health agency says world leaders will discuss efforts to clamp down on junk food marketing to children when they meet in New York on Sept 19-20.

The World Health Organization says heads of state will use the U.N. General Assembly meeting to talk about limiting the number and type of ads that children are exposed to.

WHO says 43 million preschool children around the world are overweight or obese. Experts talk of a “fat tsunami” that is already causing millions of premature deaths each year.

Bjorn-Inge Larsen of the Norwegian Directorate of Health told reporters Friday that he expects voluntary measures limiting junk food advertising to eventually evolve into laws banning the practice in the same way that has occurred with tobacco.

Warming Up Without Turning up the Heat

Sanctuary
Written by Kimberley Stakal

warm candles

Maybe you’re trying to cut back on your energy usage to save the planet, or maybe you’re just trying to chip away at your absurd PG&E bill. Either way, you don’t have to sit around home wrapped in blankets and mittens to save money and be eco. There are some pretty cheap (and green) ways to heat your house that you may not have thought of, and they’re a bit more comfortable than walking around like a mummified snowman all day.

Put plastic over the windows. Yup, it’s an old trick my dad always did in our house growing up, and you know what, it works. Cover all windows with plastic wrap (you can buy large rolls at the hardware store), and seal it over the window edges with a blow dryer. Keeps the cold air out of those leaky window cracks.

Close the doors of any rooms you’re not using. Smaller spaces lose less heat, and shutting off unused rooms reduces chilly drafts from circulating around. Even keeping your bathroom door closed can help when you’re not using it.

Switch in heavy curtains. Sub out your cutesy pink lace curtains for practical heavy winter curtains — they keep warm air in and cold air out. Get dark curtains for extra heating — they’ll absorb the heat from the sun and hold it inside the house.

Buy door draft stoppers. You’d be surprised how much cold air comes in from under the front door or garage door. Etsy and other online crafters sell some amazingly adorable draft stoppers for under 20 bucks, so now you have a decorating tool that’s also practical.

Light some candles. You may not have a fireplace in your studio apartment, but that doesn’t mean you can’t have fire. Light up a few large candles and place them around each room for a few degrees of cozy heat au natural.

Image: Finding Josephine

Please leave all comments on www.organicauthority.com.  Thank you.

More Calls to Overhaul Deceptive Front-of-Package Labeling

By Meredith Melnick Thursday, January 20, 2011

Courtesy of Prevention Institute

Courtesy of Prevention Institute

Food manufacturers have long used so-called front-of-package labeling — those carefully worded health and nutrition claims like “High in fiber!” or “All natural!” splashed on the front of processed food packages — to catch heedless grocery store shoppers’ eyes. Problem is, of course, these labels are more marketing ploy than legitimate information, designed to mislead, confuse and distract consumers, according to nutritionists and obesity researchers. In fact, many products’ labeling efforts actually flout government regulations. (More on Time.com: See packaged food labeling systems from around the world.)

Now, a new survey of kids’ food products with front-of-package health claims finds that most products don’t even meet basic nutritional standards as set by the government.

“Parents drawn to products that seem healthier for their children based on the packaging are being deceived,” wrote the study’s authors. “Currently, the front-of-package labeling system is not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — and each company sets its own standards for front-of-package labeling. Different criteria and different labels from each company only add to the confusion, and certainly don’t provide the whole nutritional story of the contents within.”

Researchers at the nonprofit Prevention Institute picked a representative sample of products from a list created by the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative. Of the 58 products examined, 84% did not meet basic nutritional criteria, contrary to what their package-front labels promised. The study found:

57% of packaged foods qualified as high sugar
95% of products contained added sugar
53% were low fiber
53% contained no fruits or vegetables
24% of the products were high in saturated fats
36% were high in sodium
17% of the packaged foods lacked a single whole food ingredient

Blind food-buying habits are likely contributing to the fact that 40% of the calories American children consume are “empty” — derived from added sugar or unhealthy fat — as recent research suggests. Currently, 23 million U.S. children are overweight or obese.

To reduce consumer confusion and encourage smarter shopping, Prevention Institute advocates for the creation of a uniform front-of-package labeling system that presents necessary nutrition information clearly, and leaves out extraneous data. (More on Time.com: See how to build a better food label.)

“Key nutrition information, including calories, saturated fat (and trans fat), added sugar and sodium should be listed in easy-to-read type, on the front of packaging,” recommended the study authors. “Nutrients associated with health, including vitamins A, C, D, calcium and fiber, should not be included since they have the potential to mislead shoppers into believing that foods with a poor overall nutritional profile” — foods that are high in fiber can also be high in added sugar, for instance — “are healthful.”

It’s an overhaul that the FDA is already pursuing. As Time.com reported last spring:

As part of its effort to improve labeling practices, on [April 29] the FDA began asking for public comment on “ways to enhance the usefulness to consumers of…information on the principal display panel of food products (‘front-of-pack’ labeling) or on shelf tags in retail stores.” In particular, the agency wants to know how consumers read and use such nutritional information, and whether there’s a way to standardize its presentation to help people make better choices. Some observers say the FDA is readying what will be the most extensive food-labeling reform since 1990.

Too Much Lead Prompts Recall Of ‘Toxic Waste Nuclear Sludge’ Candy Bars

Turns out the marketer of some candy bars sold under the Toxic Waste brand wasn’t joking.

The Food and Drug Administration says Candy Dynamics of Indianapolis is recalling all flavors of its Toxic Waste Nuclear Sludge Chew Bars after way too much lead turned up in some cherry-flavored bars in California.

The company, citing “an abundance of caution,” is pulling all flavors of the bars ever produced. Those would be the sour apple, blue raspberry and cherry chew bars. All of them are imported from Pakistan.

The problem was discovered by the Californian Department of Public Health, found 0.24 parts per million of lead in a batch of cherry-flavored bars. The FDA doesn’t allow more than 0.1 parts per million because even a little too much lead can cause health problems for little kids, infants and pregnant women.

The company says its other Toxic Waste candies, marketed on its website as “hazardously sour,” are OK and are unaffected by the recall. The potentially lead-laden bars were distributed to stores nationwide and also were sold by mail.

If you’ve got some of the bad bars, the company says to call (317-228-5012) for instructions on how to dispose of them.

Previously in candy recalls you can’t make up: A retailer in Maine pulled bags of  “Lobster Poo,” a souvenir candy popular with tourists, last September because they contained undeclared peanuts, which could cause problems for people allergic to them

Featuring Recent Posts Wordpress Widget development by YD